Question about the Octoman entry

Ley Line walkers, Juicers, Coalition Troops, Samas, Tolkeen, & The Federation Of Magic. Come together here to discuss all things Rifts®.

Moderators: Immortals, Supreme Beings, Old Ones

Enkidu80
D-Bee
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 7:31 pm

Question about the Octoman entry

Unread post by Enkidu80 »

Hi! The entry in my copy of Splynn Dimensional Market (starting on pg. 81) for the octoman states "none" under psionics. There is no explanation in the description or reason given in their stats-block for this. Yeah, I know that this happens from time to time (only so much space in a book, after all.) I only feel that this could potentially be relevant because most races that are incapable of either magic or psionics don't also reccomend OCC's that have or require magic or psionics. As they have no restrictions on magic OCC's and the book recommends the Operator OCC, the lack of psionics could be problematic in several cases. I mean, a Mystic is only about half of a spell-caster anyway, so without psionics...yikes. Again, i realize that the chances of a psionic reprive are slim, but I've been through all of the threads and this isn't addressed anywhere. I also realize that this isn't a good sign in favor of psychic cephalopods.
My inclination is that there is no error, and my dreams of a gruff, cigar-smoking, octoman cyberknight named Tako are simply to remain dreams, and, sure, there are other ways to make a "cyber-knight" out of a gruff land-octopus with a heart of gold.
Maybe someone with a recent printing can tell me if this entry is the same? Still just Psionics:None? Or point me to something I'm missing? Please, if not for me, do it for Sir Tako.
Thank you for your consideration!
User avatar
Nekira Sudacne
Monk
Posts: 15488
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 7:22 pm
Comment: The Munchkin Fairy
Location: 2nd Degree Black Belt of Post Fu
Contact:

Re: Question about the Octoman entry

Unread post by Nekira Sudacne »

Read again, the entry explictly says that some have become Cyber-Knights on page 81. So we already know it's canonically possible.

None just means, no chance for random psionics and you don't roll. they can, apparently have psionics as part of an OCC's class ability. just no random freebie.
Sometimes, you're like a beacon of light in the darkness, giving me some hope for humankind. ~ Killer Cyborg

You can have something done good, fast and cheap. If you want it done good and fast, it's not going to be cheap. If you want it done fast and cheap it won't be good. If you want something done good and cheap it won't be done fast. ~ Dark Brandon
Enkidu80
D-Bee
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 7:31 pm

Re: Question about the Octoman entry

Unread post by Enkidu80 »

Nekira Sudacne wrote:Read again, the entry explictly says that some have become Cyber-Knights on page 81. So we already know it's canonically possible.

None just means, no chance for random psionics and you don't roll. they can, apparently have psionics as part of an OCC's class ability. just no random freebie.


Thanks for the reply! Sometimes there are typos, misprints, or phantom pages in the printed books, and I try to err on the side of caution :) Sir Tako thanks you too.
Curbludgeon
Hero
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2018 7:08 am
Comment: They/Them

Re: Question about the Octoman entry

Unread post by Curbludgeon »

The Psionics entry in write ups is often played a little more fast and loose than in the preceding Magic entry. It's often spelled outright if a species can't have psionics or take a class which grants them, such as seen in the D'Norr (WB30p71 and elsewhere), but it sometimes just refers to whether a species has the "standard" distribution of Minor/Major psionics as seen with humans, while other times this is left ambiguous. Sometimes a given species has conflicting entries across different books, such as the Ogre.
User avatar
ShadowLogan
Palladin
Posts: 7401
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:50 am
Location: WI

Re: Question about the Octoman entry

Unread post by ShadowLogan »

Nekira Sudacne wrote:Read again, the entry explictly says that some have become Cyber-Knights on page 81. So we already know it's canonically possible.

None just means, no chance for random psionics and you don't roll. they can, apparently have psionics as part of an OCC's class ability. just no random freebie.

I agree they can be Cyber-Knights. However, we also know that a decent percentage of Cyber-Knights are non-psionic (20%) and only get the core power(s). So, this might not be the indicator you think it is as it applies to other classes and races (Grackle Tooth DBs make up 1% of the Ck population per SoT4 pg 23, and they are also listed as None for Psionics) as they might not be eligible to roll for their psionic power level and be skipped.

I don't disagree with you per say either as it relates to the Octoman, I just point out that it is not universal given the Grackle Tooth DB population of CKs and their description (in WB30). The GT and OM are different in how they list their OCCs, the GT does callout restrictions that the OM does not, but they do use the same description for Psionics.
User avatar
Nekira Sudacne
Monk
Posts: 15488
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 7:22 pm
Comment: The Munchkin Fairy
Location: 2nd Degree Black Belt of Post Fu
Contact:

Re: Question about the Octoman entry

Unread post by Nekira Sudacne »

ShadowLogan wrote:
Nekira Sudacne wrote:Read again, the entry explictly says that some have become Cyber-Knights on page 81. So we already know it's canonically possible.

None just means, no chance for random psionics and you don't roll. they can, apparently have psionics as part of an OCC's class ability. just no random freebie.

I agree they can be Cyber-Knights. However, we also know that a decent percentage of Cyber-Knights are non-psionic (20%) and only get the core power(s). So, this might not be the indicator you think it is as it applies to other classes and races (Grackle Tooth DBs make up 1% of the Ck population per SoT4 pg 23, and they are also listed as None for Psionics) as they might not be eligible to roll for their psionic power level and be skipped.

I don't disagree with you per say either as it relates to the Octoman, I just point out that it is not universal given the Grackle Tooth DB population of CKs and their description (in WB30). The GT and OM are different in how they list their OCCs, the GT does callout restrictions that the OM does not, but they do use the same description for Psionics.


All Cyber knights get the psi-sword at minimum, which is a psionic.
Sometimes, you're like a beacon of light in the darkness, giving me some hope for humankind. ~ Killer Cyborg

You can have something done good, fast and cheap. If you want it done good and fast, it's not going to be cheap. If you want it done fast and cheap it won't be good. If you want something done good and cheap it won't be done fast. ~ Dark Brandon
User avatar
drewkitty ~..~
Monk
Posts: 17737
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Eastvale, calif
Contact:

Re: Question about the Octoman entry

Unread post by drewkitty ~..~ »

The classes available to Octomen are limited to this classes that are not Psi based, nor have psi based fundamental powers.

Those classes that have ether minor psi powers or have psi power options, those psi powers are omitted from that char's class.

The above should of been presented somewhere in the Octomen Race stats, instead of leaving it to skilled readers to relay what it says.
May you be blessed with the ability to change course when you are off the mark.
Each question should be give the canon answer 1st, then you can proclaim your house rules.
Reading and writing (literacy) is how people on BBS interact.
User avatar
green.nova343
Adventurer
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:16 am
Location: Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: Question about the Octoman entry

Unread post by green.nova343 »

Not all Operators are psychics -- remember, only 15-20% of them are "Psi-Operators" -- so it doesn't break the "no psionics" rule for Octomen to prefer selecting Operator as their O.C.C. However, by the same token, I wouldn't allow them to become a Mystic; their description for magic says none unless the OCC says it, but just says none for psionics. Considering that every other RCC in the book either says there are psionics and/or magic available or says that psionics/magic is not available at all, I'm inclined to believe this is not a mistake in the Octoman description.

As for Cyber-Knights...the "non-psionic" Cyber-Knights are just the ones that didn't have psychic abilities before undergoing the Cyber-Knight training, as opposed to the ones who come with some sort of psionic ability. But I'd probably be hesitant to allow an Octoman to select the Cyber-Knight O.C.C., since it would violate the "no psionics" rule. The difference is that most R.C.C.s fall into 1 of 3 categories: they have innate psychic abilities (where everyone of their race has the same abilities); they have the same options for psionics as humans (i.e. an individual may have none, may be a generic minor or major psychic, or may pick a Psychic class); or they have no psychic abilities at all. Octomen seem to be in the last category...so no Cyber-Knights, no Mystics, no "Psi-Operator" option, no Techno-Wizard (since they have psychic abilities), etc.

But considering that still gives them access to hundreds of canon OCCs, including access to magic & cybernetics, I don't think they'll be hurting...
Post Reply

Return to “Rifts®”